THE Scottish Government has defended its record on Freedom of Information (FoI) requests following criticisms from a LibDem MSP.

Tavish Scott said changes to FoI policy – which now sees all information released in response to requests published online – are having a “chilling effect on journalism”, particularly investigative reports.

Concerns were raised by journalists and campaigners earlier this year about a lack of replies, late responses and minutes of meetings not being taken leading the Scottish Government to publish all FoI responses online.

Now Scott is contending that ministers have “figured out they can evade scrutiny, deter the submission of requests and spike stories by devaluing the information”. He added that the wide publication of requests “devaluing the information”.

The Scottish Government defended its position, pointing out that FOI legislation has been extended to extra public bodies and that access to national records has been reduced from 30 years to 15 as part of a drive to improve transparency.

“This is an extraordinary statement from Tavish Scott, who is suggesting that the Scottish Government is now releasing too much information, implying that we should instead cut back on the amount of material we release,” said a spokesman for Parliamentary Business Minister Joe FitzPatrick.

“Under this government, freedom of information has been extended, and Scotland now has one of the most open and transparent information and governance systems, which has been praised internationally.”

The Scottish Government’s position was unanimously condemned by MSPs in June, who called for an independent inquiry.

In response, the Government announced it would publish all information released in response to FoI requests online from July. However this move has since drawn criticisms of its own, with the former LibDem leader Scott launching scathing criticism of the system over the weekend.

“Ministers accepted a degree of criticism of their performance. However, the only measure they have really championed to address the fact they weren’t responding properly to freedom of information requests, publicly publishing all material released under FoI, is fraught with dangers of its own,” said Scott.

“Just weeks into the new regime I am hearing from journalists that this is having a chilling effect on their work. We need quality investigative journalism to acquire the truth and get to the bottom of spin. These changes are designed to deter that.

“Immediately publishing information publicly removes the incentive for journalists to pursue stories as they fear that whatever they uncover will immediately be made available to all their competitors. Fact and figures obtained under FoI may be just one part of a wider story in need of diligent pursuit.”

He added: “This wheeze means the Scottish Government can appear transparent while achieving the opposite. Ministers have figured out they can evade scrutiny, deter the submission of requests and spike stories by devaluing the information.”

The Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act was passed by the Holyrood in 2002 and gives everyone the right to ask for any information held by a Scottish public authority – over which the Scottish Parliament has jurisdiction – with a response required within 20 working days. It fulfils a similar purpose to that of the UK passed two years earlier by Tony Blair’s Labour government.

Some information can be exempt, however an organisation must explain the exemption.