EUROPEAN Union nationals living in Scotland could have a significant impact on the outcome of the next independence referendum – but only if the vote takes place before the Brexit date of March 2019.
In 2014, 57.1 per cent of people born outside of the UK voted against Scottish independence, while only 42.9 per cent voted in favour. A new report by the Scottish Centre on European Relations (SCER) suggests that if enough EU citizens living in Scotland switched their votes from No to Yes to reverse that ratio, they would deliver a potentially pivotal overall “swing” of two percentage points towards independence.
Many of those EU nationals who voted No in 2014 did so because Better Together had told them an independent Scotland would not be guaranteed EU membership. The report indicates that switching votes to Yes stay in Europe is “likely” but cannot be guaranteed, and the proportion of votes that will switch cannot be calculated, but the timing of the second referendum is crucial, says SCER.
READ MORE: Labour urged to form a unified front over Brexit amid series of contradictory statements
EU nationals currently have the right to vote for and stand as a candidate in municipal elections in whichever EU country the citizen resides – but that right will no longer be protected by EU treaties after Brexit. The UK could, but is unlikely to, unilaterally extend the franchise to cover them – therefore a significant proportion of the current electorate could be excluded from voting in indyref2.
Economists Richard Marsh and Fabian Zuleeg say in their report: “People who were born outside of the UK (which also includes eligible non-EU citizens) voted against Scottish independence in 2014 with 57.1 per cent against and 42.9 per cent for. The vote against independence was slightly higher than for all Scottish votes (57.1 per cent compared to 55.3 per cent).
“While it is likely that a number of EU citizens would switch from voting against to voting for independence in a future referendum, to preserve Scotland’s place in the EU, it is difficult to predict the extent.
“As an illustration, if the 2014 referendum voting positions of people who were born outside of the UK could be switched from 57.1 per cent against and 42.9 per cent for, to 42.9 per cent against and 57.1 per cent for (applied to the projected 2020 EU citizen cohort), it would be equivalent of closing the 2014 gap between Yes and No by around two percentage points.
“If all EU citizens vote Yes to independence, it could have a significant impact: if the 2020 projected number of EU citizens were assumed to have unanimously moved from the No to the Yes cohort in the 2014 referendum, it would have been just enough to switch the result, resulting in a 51 per cent Yes vote.”
On the timing of the second referendum, the report states: “While there can be no definite predictions, it seems clear that the decision when to exit the EU and when to hold an independence referendum could have a material impact on the outcome, given the potential size of the non-UK EU citizen cohort, which might or might not be eligible to vote in such a referendum.
“If a second referendum is held before Brexit, EU voters could tip the balance towards independence. If it happens after the UK, and Scotland, leaves the EU, this would reduce the likelihood of independence by excluding the cohort of non-UK EU citizens from the vote.”
The Scottish Government’s position is that the outcome of the Brexit talks must be known before a decision will be taken on the date of the referendum which the Scottish Parliament has voted for.
An SNP spokesperson told The National: “The SNP has always stood up for the rights of EU citizens living in the UK – whether that is the right to remain after Brexit or the ongoing right to vote and participate in elections after Brexit, and Tory attempts to use people as bargaining chips in the EU negotiations are nothing short of shameful.
“EU nationals played an incredibly positive role in the 2014 referendum – and it is only right that everyone in Scotland is given the chance to engage with the democratic process in any future vote on Scotland’s future.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel