ANIMAL charities and political activists have launched a petition which urges the Scottish Parliament to introduce mandatory CCTV installation in Scotland’s 35 abattoirs.
The petition, which has so far attracted more than 2000 signatures, was created by animal charities OneKind and Animal Aid, who have teamed up with political activists to try to reach a 10,000-signature target.
Campaigners believe that CCTV is a “practical, proportionate measure” that will provide a “vital safeguard against cruelty”.
The SNP passed a resolution in favour of mandatory slaughterhouse CCTV installation at their conference in 2016. Since then, however, there has been little in the way of progress – prompting campaigners to raise the issue directly with the Scottish Parliament.
Kay Hamilton, the Dowager Duchess of Hamilton, was one of the SNP activists who secured the resolution in support of mandatory CCTV in slaughterhouses last year and is asking the Scottish Government to “wake up to the fact that cruelty in slaughterhouses must stop”. She said: “Taking bold action and implementing party policy on mandatory CCTV in slaughterhouses would be hugely popular with the Scottish people, who expect the Scottish Government to stand up for animals.”
Animal Aid director Isobel Hutchinson added: “Animal Aid’s investigations have shown consistently that slaughterhouse workers often abuse animals when they think no-one is watching.
“Independently-monitored CCTV is a practical, proportionate measure that will detect and deter such cruelties, and provide evidence for prosecutions should it be needed.”
The Scottish Government, like the rest of the UK, recommends the installation of CCTV as best practice but does not enforce its use with legislation.
OneKind director Harry Huyton said: “We’re helping bring this petition to Parliament because it’s clear that the voluntary approach is simply not working”.
“It’s not enough just to have a few cameras covering only parts of the slaughterhouse. A mandatory requirement would mean CCTV throughout all slaughterhouses that can be accessed by independent monitors, providing a vital safeguard against cruelty.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here