NORTH Korea must make “serious moves” towards giving up its nuclear weapons programme before talks with the EU can take place, Boris Johnson has said.
The Foreign Secretary and EU counterparts agreed a statement strongly condemning Pyongyang’s nuclear and ballistic missile testing programme as a “serious threat to international peace and security”.
Johnson hinted at splits within the EU over how to deal with Kim Jong-un’s regime, with some countries keen to engage with Pyongyang before meaningful steps are taken to end its weapons programmes.
At the conclusion of a meeting in Brussels, Johnson said the EU’s Foreign Affairs Council had agreed “some tough words” on North Korea.
He said: “There are some people who think we should engage early with Pyongyang. We absolutely disagree with that.
“They have got to make serious moves towards denuclearising their country before it is right for us to begin a proper dialogue, and I’m glad the council conclusions reflected that.”
The council’s statement reaffirmed the EU’s policy of “critical engagement” with Pyongyang, using sanctions and other measures while “keeping communication and dialogue channels open”.
That process was a way to push for North Korea’s compliance with United Nations resolutions “in terms of abandoning its nuclear, WMD [weapons of mass destruction] and ballistic missile programmes in a complete, verifiable and irreversible manner and progress on all other issues of concern”.
“The council urges the DPRK [Democratic People’s Republic of Korea] to make credible progress on its obligations to denuclearise, enabling negotiations leading to a peaceful solution.”
North Korea raised the stakes earlier this month with a test launch of an intercontinental ballistic missile that its defence officials said marked the “final step” in creating a “confident and powerful nuclear state that can strike anywhere on earth”.
Johnson said progress was being made with calls for China to use its influence on Pyongyang, but there was “more to be done”.
He said: “We remain absolutely determined to try to get the North Koreans to see sense and to continue to put pressure on the regime in Pyongyang, and we think the best way to do that is, of course, to put pressure on the Chinese, and we are seeing some progress there but there is more to be done.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here