AN international agreement that allows foreign fishing vessels access to British waters has been scrapped by the UK Government.
The move has been backed by Holyrood but criticised as “unhelpful” by the Irish Government.
UK Environment Secretary Michael Gove said yesterday that withdrawing from the London Fisheries Convention would “take back control” of British waters.
Scrapping the 1964 agreement, signed prior to the UK joining the EU, means that British fishing boats will also be barred from fishing six to 12 nautical miles off the coasts of Ireland, the Netherlands, Germany, France and Belgium. The 12 to 200 mile fishing area will form a key part of the Brexit negotiations.
Gove said withdrawal from the London Fisheries Convention was an important first step in the UK’s return to “an independent coastal state”.
“This means for the first time in more than 50 years we will be able to decide who can access our waters,” he said.
“This is a historic first step towards building a new domestic fishing policy as we leave the European Union — one which leads to a more competitive, profitable and sustainable industry for the whole of the UK.”
Scottish ministers said they had been arguing for withdrawal for some time.
Fisheries Secretary Fergus Ewing said: “Our priority is to protect our fishing industry and allowing unrestricted access to our waters to remain through this convention clearly would not be doing that.
“The Scottish government will always stand up for our fishing industry, which too often has been let down by the UK government.”
The move has been welcomed by the Scottish Fishermen’s Federation.
Its chief executive, Bertie Armstrong, said: “Access to our rich fishing grounds will become a matter for us on withdrawal from the Common Fisheries Policy and leaving the London Convention as part of that sends a very strong additional message of commitment.”
However, Irish Agriculture, Food and Marine Minister Michael Creed said the withdrawal was both “unwelcome and unhelpful”.
“It is a part of Brexit and will be considered by the EU27 member states and the [Michel] Barnier team when the negotiations commence,” he said. “Brexit poses very serious challenges to the seafood sector and this announcement will form part of the negotiations.”
The issue was described as “a bit of a fuss over nothing” by Greenpeace UK’s head of oceans, Will McCallum, who said the withdrawal would not make much difference to the UK fishing industry as the UK would still have to abide by the UN convention of the law of the seas — which insists on cooperation between neighbouring countries.
Leaving the convention would also, like Brexit, be a lengthy process.
He said that in any case the UK Government had the means to decide how fishing quota is allocated following a Common Fisheries Policy reform in 2013, yet research had shown that nearly two thirds of that quota was held by just three companies.
“For years, successive UK governments have blamed Brussels for their own failure to support the small-scale, sustainable fishers who are the backbone of our fishing fleet,” McCallum said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel