THE Scottish Green Party Co-convenors, Patrick Harvie and Maggie Chapman, have published an open letter to Nicola Sturgeon calling on her to remain committed to a referendum once the terms of Brexit are known.
Sturgeon is expected to make an announcement on Monday regarding the SNP's plans for a future referendum following the loss of 21 seats in the general election.
The First Minister had originally laid out a timetable which would have called for an independence referendum when the Brexit deal was known, though this announcement today could see that plan abandoned.
The Greens are asking Sturgeon to "resist the calls from opponents who have conceded to a Hard Brexit and who demand that the Scottish Government abandons the objective of holding an independence referendum and giving the people of Scotland a choice over our collective future."
The full letter sent to the First Minister has been printed below:
---------------------------------
Dear First Minister,
We are writing in advance of the statement you are expected to make before the Scottish Parliament’s summer recess, regarding your plans for a possible independence referendum. As you know the Scottish Greens first called for a Section 30 order back in October 2016, to allow the Scottish people to decide on this issue. We took this position in light not only of the EU Referendum result, but also of the UK Government’s choice to ignore the strong Remain vote in Scotland and to take a narrow UK-wide Leave vote as a pretext for the ‘Hard Brexit’ stance which we know will do so much damage to our economy and society. When the issue was put to a vote at Holyrood in March this year, we continued to make this case.
On the question of timing, it seems quite reasonable to us that once the negotiations are concluded and the ‘deal’ is known, and broadly in the same period during which all other EU member states will have the chance to ratify the outcome, the people of Scotland should have their chance to decide on their future. The people who live here should not be the only people in Europe to remain voiceless at this critically important time.
Following the 2017 General Election, it is clear that some are making the case that the relative fortunes of the political parties in Scotland give a basis for claiming that the right of people in Scotland to decide their constitutional future has been “rejected”. We cannot accept this, and we urge you not to. The single clearest implication of the general election, which was called for shallow and opportunistic reasons by a Prime Minister who was then barely willing to campaign, is that her request for a strong mandate for her Hard Brexit agenda has been refused by voters throughout these islands. This must be seen alongside the unchanged reality that Scotland has not consented to leaving the EU in the first place, and is being all but ignored in the whole process.
Given these facts, we see nothing to change the argument in favour of Scotland’s future being decided by the people who live here, on the timescale outlined above, one which we see as giving both maximum information and opportunity to voters as they make their choice. As such – and given the critical period we find ourselves in – we hope that you will resist the calls from opponents who have conceded to a Hard Brexit and who demand that the Scottish Government abandons the objective of holding an independence referendum and giving the people of Scotland a choice over our collective future. That choice would be between the angry, isolated Brexit Britain the current Westminster government are constructing or putting Scotland’s future in Scotland’s hands as an independent country at the heart of Europe. In such a choice the Scottish Greens will of course campaign for our longstanding policy of independence and full European Union membership.
As you are well aware the movement for Scottish independence is broad, diverse and goes far beyond either of our two parties. Just as it is important for voters to judge political parties on the basis of more than a single position, so it is essential that no single party is seen as the entirety of the pro-independence movement. Indeed in any future independence referendum it will be more important than ever that voters are able to distinguish clearly between that constitutional choice and support for any particular party’s record or policies in government. It is true that our two parties – and many other people in Scotland - agree that remaining part of the Single Market and protecting the free movement of people are interlinked and fundamental to Scotland's approach as a welcoming nation and that a Hard Brexit alternative would inevitably mean far more job losses and damage to our economy.
However Greens believe that the European Union is about much more than the Single Market. We believe in the European project as a way to break down barriers between peoples, to tackle climate change, promote democracy and justice across the world and of course, as the most successful peace project in history. We also believe that the EU needs fundamental reform and democratisation; we believe in a people's Europe, not a Europe for the corporations. These goals are too great to give up on and while leaving the European Union but not the Single Market would limit the economic damage, it would still leave both Europe and Scotland weaker for each other’s absence. This future as part of a progressive Europe contrasts with our current position in which political choices are imposed upon us by a Conservative Party which called a referendum and an election which were not needed, lost both, and now finds itself propped up by the DUP.
There can be no doubt that the UK is in a political crisis, and the closer we get to Brexit the more its deficiencies will be exposed. The stakes are too high for our future to be decided yet again by a Government that we did not elect, enforcing a Hard Brexit for which they received no mandate from Scotland in last year’s referendum and which was rejected entirely in this year’s UK-wide election. The people of Scotland must be given a choice over their future and we write to urge you, as First Minister of Scotland, to continue fighting for that choice. We certainly will be.
Yours sincerely,
Maggie Chapman and Patrick Harvie MSP
Co-conveners, Scottish Green Party
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel