A SENIOR SNP MSP has called on Nicola Sturgeon to commission a report for the party identifying what went wrong in its election campaign.
Richard Lochhead, the former Cabinet Secretary for Rural Affairs, urged the First Minister to ensure a study is carried out to establish why thousands of former supporters switched to the Tories in last week’s General Election.
Lochhead is the most influential figure in the party yet to voice concerns over the campaign, with his comments following interventions from more critical figures such as ex-ministers Alex Neil and Kenny MacAskill.
Despite the Conservatives losing support across the UK, the party got 12 extra seats in Scotland, including six in the north-east, bringing its total number of Scottish MPs to 13, its best result since 1983.
Former First Minister Alex Salmond and Westminster leader Angus Robertson, who represented Gordon and Moray respectively, were the highest-profile SNP casualties of the night which saw the party on 35 seats after losing 21.
Salmond and Robertson both lost to Tory candidates.
“I think the First Minister should be commissioning some work into the dynamics in this election campaign,” Lochhead told The National.
“There was a very complex backdrop to the campaign but we have ended up in a situation where on the one hand we have achieved the remarkable result of winning a General Election campaign in Scotland for the second time in a row, but at the same time we have large swathes of Scotland where people turned to the Conservatives and we have lost major personalities who were invaluable to our cause such as Alex Salmond and Angus Robertson.”
He said he was “gutted” the Tories won seats such as Moray and believed the SNP needed to demonstrate it was listening to the electorate and understood the reasons why so many former supporters had moved to the Conservatives.
“Two key issues of course were the timing of an independence referendum and our message on Brexit, which particularly in Moray was a key factor in our defeat,” he added.
Reflecting criticisms made by others, he said the SNP message – in particular on a second referendum – was not sufficiently clear to counter the arguments made by the Unionist parties.
“We didn’t seem to have a message for SNP supporters in particular who were willing to hold their nose and vote Tory due to a fear the SNP would prevent us from leaving the EU,” he said.
He added: “There is no doubt we failed to come up with a clear message to counter the impression [made by the opposition parties] we were going to press ahead with a second referendum come hell or high water, and perhaps that was due to the timeline associated with it rather than circumstances Brexit would have on Scotland."
A SNP spokesperson: “The SNP won the election in Scotland, with a majority of seats – more than all the other parties combined.
"At the same time, we have made clear we will reflect on the overall result, including those seats which were lost, and what that means going forward – which will obviously entail consideration of local and national factors.”
Lochhead has been an SNP MSP since 1999 and previously worked as an office manager for Salmond.
He stood down from his regional seat to fight and win the Moray constituency by-election in April 2006.
He was appointed Cabinet Secretary for Rural Affairs and the Environment in May 2007 and held the position until May last year.
The SNP lost six seats to Labour amid a late surge in support for UK leader Jeremy Corbyn, who managed to win over considerable number of Yes supporters, and three to the Liberal Democrats.
Sturgeon’s party won 59.3 per cent of the seats with 36.9 per cent of the vote.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel