CRAIG Whyte was the “fall guy” and not “a pantomime villain” when he took over Rangers FC in 2011, the High Court in Glasgow was told yesterday.

Advocate Donald Findlay QC, is defending Whyte, 46, on two charges, one of fraud and the second a breach of the Companies Act.

He told the jury of eight men and seven women in his summing up that his client was “manifestly” not guilty.

Findlay said: “You have seen witness after witness come into court not wanting to take responsibility and sought to absolve themselves for anything that happened.

“It is the playground mentality – it wasn’t me. That is the attitude of so many witnesses in this case.” The Crown alleges that before his takeover of Rangers in 2011, Whyte pretended to then club owner Sir David Murray, and others, that funds were available to make all the required payments to acquire a “controlling and majority stake” in the club.

The court has heard the sale of the club was eventually made to Whyte for £1 but came with obligations to pay an £18m bank debt, a £2.8m “small tax case” bill, £1.7m for stadium repairs, £5m for players and £5m in working capital. Evidence has been led that Whyte used money from the Ticketus lending company secured against future season ticket sales.

The second charge under the Companies Act concerns the £18m payment between Whyte’s Wavetower company and Rangers to clear a bank debt.

Findlay said: “A recurrent theme of what I will say to you is that the Crown approach is wrong, unfair, unjustified and unjustifiable.

“They are asking you to take 10 words from the indictment and that, if you look at those words, Mr Whyte is guilty.

“The Crown are asking you to be selective in the most selective way imaginable. That is just wrong, that is just unfair.”

Findlay said there had been “buck passing, back protecting and blind eye turning” during the trial.

He added: “What we have to do is sweep all that away and look at it in its context and in the real world.

“There have been attempts to portray Craig Whyte as a pantomime villain... that everything was fine until he came along.

“But, that is far from the truth. He is being made to be the fall guy.

The QC asked the jury to consider the “whole evidence in this case” and pointed to an email from chartered accountant Michael McGill, who worked for the Murray Group, which included reference to Whyte’s “other investors”.

Findlay said: “What is the only question if you are really concerned about the source of the money? It is “who are they... what other investors?’.”

The court has heard evidence that no due diligence was done on the deal and Findlay said the Murray side did “absolutely nothing” in that regard.

He told the jury: “Only one conclusion can be drawn from that – it did not matter that there were other investors. It was the deal that mattered.”

He then told the court the Murray team “ought to have known” about any role Ticketus had. Findlay said a “massive organisation” like the Murray Group could have made enquiries to “explain what this is all about”.

Findlay said it was clear Whyte had bought the shares to take over Rangers. He added: “Was there a crime? The defence say that manifestly there was not.”

The trial before Lady Stacey will continue on Monday when Findlay will conclude his summing up before the judge will give her charge to the jury after which they will retire to consider their verdict.