NICOLA Sturgeon has said she is “utterly determined” to press on with educational reforms after coming under fire for poor literacy statistics.
Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson asked whether the First Minister was “embarrassed, ashamed or both” following the publication of the latest Scottish survey of literacy and numeracy (SSLN).
Davidson went on the attack at FMQs after the survey showed fewer than half of Scotland’s 13 and 14-year-olds are able to write well while the writing performance of P4 and P7 pupils has also dropped.
She said: “Today in Scotland in an S2 class of 30 pupils, on average, five can’t write properly. That’s double the number just four years ago. When the First Minister sees statistics like these does she feel embarrassed, ashamed or both?”
Sturgeon responded: “What I feel is utterly determined, determined to carry on with the changes we’re making in Scottish education so that we continue to see the improvements in attainment and progress in closing the attainment gap.”
The First Minister said she was not going “to try in any way to diminish the significance” of the SSLN findings but argued the study was a sample that measured S2 pupils against the standard they are expected to reach in S3. In contrast, she said, the Government’s “comprehensive” national improvement framework data showed over 80 per cent of S3 pupils were meeting the required standard.
Sturgeon was also pressed on evidence taken by MSPs on the Education Committee, which heard trainee teachers are graduating without sufficient skills to teach maths to P7s.
She said the Government had increased the intake into teacher education and pointed out the content of teacher education was a matter for universities, with four Scottish universities ranked in the top seven across the UK for teacher education.
She added: “When Ruth Davidson talks about the time spent in this chamber debating the constitution, what she’s trying to distract attention from is that that has been time debating the implications of Brexit. The Brexit disaster that the Tory Party is leading this country into.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here