★★☆☆☆
TAKING sugary sentiment to new heights, this bizarre talking dog-themed family drama shamelessly pulls at the heartstrings like a new-born puppy at your trouser leg as it attempts to find out the answer to the question: what is the meaning of a dog’s life?
Josh Gad lends his undeniably endearing voice to the parade of dogs that populate this story but which are, in fact, the same dog living new life after new life in search of his true purpose. He starts off as Bailey, a Golden Retriever brought into the home of loving eight-year-old Ethan (Bryce Gheisar) with whom he lives a long and happy life on a farm.
Then, as he himself tells us in the film’s earnest and unyielding narration, it’s his time to go as he’s put to sleep in old age. But before he knows it he’s back, this time as a German Shepherd police dog and in the hands of a no-nonsense officer (John Ortiz). Then as a lonely college student’s Corgi, then as… well, you get the idea.
It’s a hard film to truly hate because its heart is in the right place, stuffed as it is with morality messages ranging from the care a dog needs to the attachment that it forms with its owner to the overall existential crisis that our canine protagonist endlessly ponders. Anyone with a natural love of dogs will find plenty to flex their “awww!” muscles.
But the relentless sappiness and mawkishness becomes oh so tiresome even by the end of the first dog’s life – never mind the rest of the drama – coming across as a manipulative Hallmark Channel TV movie that just so happens to have found its way into the cinema with some big names.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here