CLASH (15)
★★★★
THIS frighteningly realistic, politically and religiously charged film from second-time director Mohamed Diab (Cairo 678) takes an up-close-and-personal look at what happened in 2013 after Egyptian President Morsi, a member of Islamist party the Muslim Brotherhood (MB), was forcibly removed from power by the military following the largest protests in Egyptian history.
Rather extraordinarily the entire film takes place in one solitary location, the confines of a police van in which an unjustly arrested group of people are herded together, left to clash amongst themselves, threatened and hosed down if things get out of hand. They include people from all degrees of social backgrounds, some pro-MB and some vehemently anti, mixed with neutral citizens with no affiliation but simply a victim of being in the wrong place at the wrong time in a country they love that’s torturously at war with itself.
Crucially the group also includes two Associated Press journalists, the first to be detained within the police truck, there to capture the political unrest but looked upon with untrusting eyes as potential spies. “An activist dies for a cause not a photo,” one says. “Sometimes a photo can be the cause,” the other replies.
Diab’s film is an incredibly raw and angry experience, with a potent way of getting across its points about loyalty, us and them mentality and the violent conflict that inevitably arises from religiously-fueled revolution. His accomplished hand-held camera approach, coupled with uncomfortably long takes, imbues the drama with palpable urgency, gritty realism and sustained unpredictability.
It’s a film that cleverly constructs the outward tensions that have bubbled over into full on city-wide riots, attempted to be controlled by armed police, into a constricted melting pot single location in which the film’s fitting title takes on many meanings: the clash of power, religion, morality, ideals, generational differences and slivers of humanity in the face of cruelty and injustice.
All the while we’re left to witness the horrors unfold outside from between the bars on the windows.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here