THE Loch Ness Monster has been refused permanent UK residency by the Home Office.
A Glasgow-based arts collective made the application on behalf of Nessie after the Brexit vote, saying they were concerned she might “leave the UK to settle in a new lake within the EU”.
The Doing Group filled in the necessary form and sent it in to the Home Office along with a passport photo of the monster and the £65 fee.
The Home Office’s response states simply: “Thank you for the above application. From the information provided it appears that a refund is appropriate.”
Hannah Kendaru, 23, a member of the group, said: “We filed the application in good faith. However, the process was a difficult one. Nessie has a reputation for being elusive – signatures, passport photos and other information were very difficult to obtain. Nessie has lived in Scotland for a long time. Yet her origin is unknown. Due to the worries that Brexit has caused, it was only natural to apply for a residency permit.”
The group say that while Nessie’s “contribution to society is of incredible cultural and financial benefit to the nation, her origins are unclear.”
They are appealing for members of the public to suggest an alternative post-Brexit home for her via their website, ahomefornessie.com.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here