A SUPERCHARGED vow to beef up the Scottish Parliament’s powers beyond their current level could shape the debate ahead of a second referendum on Scottish independence, according to a leading academic.

And Charlie Jeffery, senior vice-principal and professor of politics at the University of Edinburgh, said a fresh independence campaign is likely to emulate the tactics used by the Leave side in the EU referendum, stressing a “take back control” message.

Jeffery’s comments were published to coincide with the launch of new independent Scottish EU think tank, the Scottish Centre on European Relations (SCER).

He argued the Yes side in Scotland “will have noted what worked in the Brexit referendum”.

“The Leave campaign was not exactly strong on carefully-calibrated cost-benefit analysis. It went for the gut: ‘let’s take back control’,” he said. “Its case focused on legitimacy, what felt right and wrong, not what could be demonstrated by reasoned argument or, heaven forbid, ‘expertise’.

“So expect more of a Scottish version of ‘taking back control’ and less of the attempt to map out all the details of what independence might mean that we saw in the 2014 independence White Paper. All those details were hooks for challenge: What currency? How big would oil revenues be? How would EU membership be secured?

“Already we can see hints of a different approach: a willingness to concede that the economic challenges of independence would be difficult, or that full EU membership for Scotland might need to be a medium-term goal.

“Expect an approach which says we don’t have all the answers, things will be uncertain, but that we in Scotland should be the ones finding answers and dealing with uncertainty, not them in Westminster and Whitehall.”

Jeffery said a “super vow” to strengthen the Scottish Parliament was something the Parliament itself had proposed in its paper last December on Scotland’s place in Europe.

“Full repatriation of powers from the EU to the Scottish Parliament; additional powers in areas like immigration; and a right to act externally in the exercise of those powers,” he said. “This would be a Scotland in the UK, but with scope to shape a distinctive relationship with the EU.”

But he added that such a move was “doubtful”, given that the ideas in Scotland’s Place in Europe appear to have been rejected without discussion.

Theresa May’s response to Brexit seems focused on assuaging the concerns of voters in England whose gut feelings about the EU and concerns about immigration are matched only by their sense that Scotland already gets too good a deal within the UK,” continued Jeffery.

The SCER said it aims to provide high-quality research and analysis of European Union developments and challenges, with a particular focus on Scotland.

It will be chaired by David Wilson, executive director of the International Public Policy Institute at the University of Strathclyde, with Dr Kirsty Hughes, who has worked with European think tanks including Chatham House, Friends of Europe and the Centre for European Policy Studies, as director.

Writing about the 60th birthday of the EU, Hughes said it has many achievements to celebrate, adding: “But it is also in the midst of its most difficult, cumulative set of challenges it has faced in its six decades. The EU needs a new, bold strategic approach but it does not have the political leadership, solidarity or confidence to create such an approach.”