SCOTTISH fishermen have voiced concerns at a downgrading of haddock in a new guide by the Marine Conservation Society which they fear will affect consumer behaviour.
Haddock from three North Sea and West of Scotland fisheries are no longer on the charity’s recommended ‘‘green’’ list of fish to eat, having been downgraded because stock numbers in 2016 were below the recommended level.
The Scottish Fishermen’s Federation (SFF) said fish stocks in the area are well-managed at sustainable levels.
SFF chief executive Bertie Armstrong said: “The MCS has completely misunderstood the position as far as haddock stocks are concerned and should withdraw its utterly misleading comments.
“The organisation is trying to alter consumer behaviour on completely false premises.
“Fish stocks are sustainable when the amount of fish caught is below the maximum sustainable yield. For haddock that has been since 2007 - and last year advice from fisheries scientists at the International Council for the Exploration of the Seas (ICES) was for an increase in the catch of 30 per cent.
“They then discovered that there had been an error in their assessments, corrected the statistical model and recommended a reduction in the catch of 45 per cent, which was adopted. The fishery continues to be managed at sustainable levels, and the spawning stock for haddock will increase significantly in 2018.”
International conservation body, The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC), which certifies the sustainability of fish and seafood also gave its backing to Scottish North Sea haddock and contradicted the MCS advice. It insisted consumers can enjoy haddock suppers with a “clear conscience”.
MCS spokesman James Simpson said: “The Scottish haddock fishery is still MSC certified due to the strong management they have in place to deal with changing stocks.
“The fishermen have already worked with the government to set lower quotas in response to the latest scientific advice. In fact they’ve set their catches even lower than the recommendations. It’s a bold move to protect the haddock stock for the long term.
The Marine Conservation Society, however, said it had not called for haddock to be taken off menus, which it only does with fish with an “avoid” high score of five.
It added that ratings for North Sea and West of Scotland haddock are rated three and four in its guide.
A spokeswoman said: “The new ratings for North Sea and West of Scotland haddock are three and four. The new ratings come after the latest scientific advice from ICES which was released in November last year.
“This advice indicated that the levels of fishing that can be considered sustainable for this population are lower than previously thought, meaning a smaller proportion should be caught. This means that advice for catches in 2017 are 47 per cent lower than originally advised for catches in 2016.
“Latest quotas have been reduced in line with this scientific advice, and the biomass is expected to significantly increase this year.
“Contrary to some suggestions, consumers should not expect to see a shortage of haddock in shops.
“A new assessment will be undertaken later this year, when new ICES advice becomes available, and if the health of the fishery has improved as expected, this will be reflected in MCS ratings.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel