PROMOTER Eddie Hearn claims Ricky Burns refused easier options to take a “nightmare” fight with Julius Indongo.
Burns will face the unbeaten Namibian for the WBA, IBF and IBO World super-lightweight titles to unify the division at the SSE Hydro in Glasgow on April 15.
The 33-year-old Scot became a three-weight world champion when he claimed the vacant WBA title by beating Michele di Rocco last year.
Indongo, 34, won the IBF and IBO titles with a stunning first round knock-out of Russian Eduard Troyanovsky in Moscow in December and when Burns was given the option of a unification fight his mind was quickly set.
Hearn said: “Indongo is a tall, rangy fighter that can punch, who not a lot of people know a lot about. So yes, absolutely a nightmare “Other fights came up, bigger names but were easier.
“Obviously I went to Ricky and said you can fight this guy for X money or this horrible nightmare for less money, what you want to do?
“He said I will fight the horrible guy for less money, I have won three world championships and I want to unify.
“I phoned Alex (Morrison, Burns’ manager) who agreed with me 100 per cent as any advisor would and said he would give him a call.
“It is a 50-50 fight really. You would like to think that Indongo could fold under the pressure of coming to Glasgow with the amazing crowd but then you realise he went to Russia and knocked out the champion so you can’t look for that for inspiration.
“This is the icing on the cake, this is the one he wants more than anything.”
Burns, in the middle of his training camp, was determined to nail down a unification fight after years of speculation.
He said: “There were a couple of options but these unification fights have been dangled in front of me so you can’t expect me not to jump at it.
“I know it is a much harder fight, a riskier fight. But every fight is a risk.
“I am confident of going out and getting a win.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here