INCREASINGLY restrictive policies on family migration from the UK government are having a widespread impact across Scotland, says a new report.

And Stuart McDonald, the SNP’s immigration spokesperson, is calling for a reform of the rules which are “unfairly separating Scottish families and damaging Scotland’s economy”.

It follows publication of a joint report - Family Migration: A Scottish Perspective - from the SNP’s justice and home affairs team and the Glasgow Refugee Asylum and Migration Network (GRAMnet), which reveals the impact the spousal visa minimum income threshold – introduced in 2012 – is having on families in Scotland.

Under the rules, any UK citizen who wants to sponsor a spouse to live with them here must earn a minimum of £18,600, rising to £22,400 for a first child, and an additional £2,400 for each subsequent child.

The minimum income must be met entirely by the UK citizen, and no account is taken of the foreign spouse’s prospective earnings, family support, or local wage levels and living costs. The previous salary threshold was £5,500 per year and included prospective spousal earnings.

According to the report, the changes have had a disproportionately negative impact on people in Scotland, as 41 per cent of UK citizens in the country do not earn enough to sponsor a spouse and 53 per cent do not earn enough to sponsor a spouse and child. This compares to 27 per cent and 34 per cent respectively in London.

McDonald said: “This report highlights the urgent need for reform and for devolution of immigration powers, so that we can create a tailored system that meets Scotland’s needs and values. It is unacceptable that the current rules are separating spouses and stopping children from being with their parents. It cannot be right that people who could be united with their loved ones, who would make a valued contribution to society, and a valuable contribution to the economy, are instead being excluded to the detriment of our country. As they stand these unreasonable and inflexible rules are disproportionately affecting families across Scotland, with around half of Scottish people earning less than is now required by the restrictive minimum income threshold that the UK government has imposed.

“The SNP want to see the rules reformed with a lower threshold that reflects the variation in average income and cost of living across the UK, and that allows for the earning capacity of a spouse to be taken into account.”

Written by Helen Baillot, a researcher in forced migration, and former head of integration at the Scottish Refugee Council, Joe Brady, the report said Scotland’s position as a country whose devolved administration recognises the benefits of inwards migration, was being undermined by UK government attempts to “define and control which families merit entry and settlement in the UK”.

“This approach also undermines the supposedly universal right to a family life and instead limits it to only those families who have the economic power to qualify for love,” the authors said. They added that given the impending Brexit negotiations, a review of family migration policy would be timely.

“The many transnational families who have formed during the time of the UK’s EU membership may not until now have experienced the rigours of the family migration system. But the uncertainty created by ‘Brexit’ brings the very real human impact of restrictive immigration controls sharply into focus. For Scotland to remain at the forefront of a human rights-based approach to migration policy issues, and take her place on the world stage, her political leaders must develop policy proposals which seek to remedy the deep economic, social and geographical inequalities that dominate current family migration policy.”