IT would be a “huge mistake” if Ruth Davidson headed up a future campaign to keep Scotland and the UK together, Labour’s Kezia Dugdale has claimed.
The Scottish Tory leader, who has championed the cause of the Union, has transformed the Conservatives in Scotland, making them the second largest party at Holyrood.
But the Scottish Labour leader said if there was to be another vote on independence, the pro-Union campaign should look outside of politics for its leader.
Dugdale also said that if Scots are “forced” into a second referendum, she could “not imagine” working with the Tories again in a repeat of the Better Together campaign that was successful in 2014.
Nicola Sturgeon has said another referendum is “highly likely” in the wake of Theresa May’s plans for a hard Brexit and speculation has been rife the First Minister may call one for next year over the coming weeks.
During a fringe event she was questioned on what Labour’s stance should be in a second independence referendum, and said she would be in favour of a federal option on the ballot paper.
“With regard to should there be an option in any future referendum, it’s not going to surprise you for me to say I don’t want there to be another referendum,” she said.
“But I can certainly see a legitimate case for if there were to be a referendum that you might put something as strong as a federal solution for the United Kingdom on the ballot paper.”
It was put to her that it is “not inconceivable” that Ms Davidson could lead a future pro-UK campaign, but the Scottish Labour leader said: “That would be a huge mistake.”
She added: “I think that in this referendum that’s not going to happen, we could draw some lessons from the EU referendum and seek to try to have a non political voice at the forefront of that, but I can’t say I’ve spent a huge amount of time contemplating who that might be.”
She added: “I think that in this referendum that’s not going to happen, we could draw some lessons from the EU referendum and seek to try to have a non political voice at the forefront of that, but I can’t say I’ve spent a huge amount of time contemplating who that might be.”
She also insisted: “In that independence referendum that’s not going to happen I would be arguing very strongly for a Labour case for the Union.”
Dugdale added: “If we are forced to go through it again, I will be making a Labour case for the benefits of the United Kingdom.”
She believed her federalism proposals would help win back previous Labour supporters who had moved to the Yes cause, saying her plans represented a move away from the “status quo”.
Dugdale and UK party deputy Tom Watson will address the conference today, with UK leader Jeremy Corbyn speaking on Sunday.
In a constant theme for the conference she is expected to say she will fight against independence and will “fight tirelessly to make sure” the Union side win.
During her Q and A with the Record she said there is “no escaping” the economic case for independence has weakened since 2014.
“We would be faced with a £15 billion deficit,” Dugdale said.
“So as much as I hear Nicola Sturgeon talk about an improved social security system, welfare and all the things she would do if we were independent, the hard cash to realise those ambitions isn’t there.”
She added: “I don’t believe a second independence would be won – that’s not why I’m against it. I’m against it because it would be bad for Scotland.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel