MANAGER Owen Coyle left Championship side Blackburn Rovers yesterday "by mutual agreement".
Two days after nearly securing an FA Cup replay against Manchester United, Rovers and Coyle went their separate ways with the club admitting they fear for their Championship status as they are second bottom with only 15 games remaining.
Coyle, who has previously been in charge of Burnley, Bolton and Wigan in the region, only arrived at Ewood Park last summer having recently managed MLS team Houston Dynamo.
The appointment of the Scot, 50, was a surprise given his previous ties with Blackburn's east-Lancashire rivals Burnley and the fact he had not managed in the country since an ill-fated spell with Wigan in 2013.
His record in elevating Burnley into the Premier League is believed to have been viewed favourably by Rovers' Indian owners Venky's after a four-year absence from the top flight.
However, having assumed a position that Paul Lambert walked away from because he felt he was not going to be backed, the club sold both Grant Hanley and central-defensive partner Shane Duffy at the start of the season and have toiled in the lower reaches ever since.
The club insisted there was money to spend in the January transfer window, but Coyle was left frustrated having seen deals for four players fail to materialise before the deadline.
Having won just twice since November in the league, there is a real fear among supporters that the former Premier League winners could now drop into the third tier.
A statement from the club read: "Blackburn Rovers wish to announce that manager Owen Coyle has left his role at Ewood Park by mutual agreement.
"Assistant manager Sandy Stewart, first-team coach John Henry and goalkeeping coach Phil Hughes have also left the club.
"The decision has been taken in order to give the club the best possible chance of climbing to a position of safety in the Championship in the remaining 15 games, which starts with the big trip to Burton Albion on Friday night."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here