THE number of Type-26 frigates to be built on the Clyde could be reduced further due to ballooning costs, it has been claimed.
With the number already cut from 13 to eight, the UK Government’s nuclear “obsession” could result in a further drop along with other huge gaps in the UK’s defence forces, according to the SNP.
The SNP's claim that the spending earmarked for Trident could hit the frigates is based on a report that shows conventional defences are being stretched while the UK Government is planning to spend in excess of £200 billion on new nuclear submarines. The spending is earmarked despite recent revelations about malfunctioning missile systems.
The vast expense of Trident is taking vital funds away from the UK’s conventional defence forces that should be providing them with the support and kit they need, according to the SNP.
The allegation comes after a national newspaper reported that the UK’s conventional defence is being left with gaping holes. These include £1bn Type-46 destroyers that can be detected by submarines up to 100 miles away, armoured vehicles that are too big to fit in the RAF’s main transport aircraft, and fresh concerns that the number of Type-26 frigates to be built on the Clyde could be reduced further, having already fallen from 13 to eight due to ballooning costs.
“It is time for the UK Government to get over its obsession with nuclear weapons and Trident and to offer the correct support to our conventional forces by giving them the kit and equipment they need to effectively do their jobs,” said SNP Defence spokesperson Brendan O’Hara.
“Some of the reports in the Sunday Times are absolutely farcical, with Type-45 destroyers being described as ‘noisy as hell’ and detectable at a range of 100 miles, and drones that cost £1.2 billion a piece still being unable to enter full service due to technical glitches 12 years after being commissioned.
“And the ongoing concerns about the future of the Type-26 project, being built at shipyards on the Clyde, are very disturbing, having already had the original number cut from 13 to eight, with the Sunday Times warning this could fall further. The Tories need to get their act together to make sure they don’t betray the shipyard workers yet again.
He added: “It is clear that the Tories would rather waste billions and billions on renewing the malfunctioning obscenity that is Trident, rather than ensuring our conventional forces are properly equipped. They must wake up to the reality that their obsession with morally obscene nuclear weapons is costing our defences dearly.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel