ENVIRONMENTAL campaigners have hailed the “transformation” in electricity production after figures showed power generated in Scotland has a significantly smaller impact on climate change when compared to the UK average.
The Scottish Government’s “leadership on renewables” was hailed by WWF Scotland as a key factor in the reduction in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions produced as a result of generating each kilowatt hour (kWH) of energy.
The most recent figures show that in 2014, electricity generated in Scotland resulted in 196 CO2/kWH, compared to 400 for the UK as a whole.
In addition, the climate change impact of electricity production in Scotland dropped by almost two-fifths (38 per cent) between 2010 and 2014, while the UK saw a reduction of 12 per cent over the same period.
WWF Scotland climate and energy policy officer Fabrice Leveque said: “Thanks to the Scottish Government’s leadership on renewables policy, the climate change impact of producing electricity in Scotland has fallen rapidly and is now half that of the whole of the UK.
“Electricity accounts for just one quarter of our energy use, so if we’re to meet our future climate targets, the Scottish Government must build on the progress made in the electricity sector to set a 50 per cent renewables target for by 2030.”
Heating and transport needs account for three-quarters of energy usage in Scotland, with low-carbon heat expert Dave Pearson of Star Renewable Energy suggesting the installation of gas boilers should be halted in a bid to provide “cleaner, cheaper heat” in homes and buildings.
“The Scottish Government should bring forward bold policies to make sure we are installing the right future-proof technologies in our buildings,” he said.
Coline Howden of Transform Scotland said emissions produced by transport had “barely declined” from the level they were at in 1990.
He added: “We need to level the playing field so that public transport, cycling and walking can compete with the private car, and have a long-term strategy that clearly shows how all transport will shift over to low-carbon.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here