THE higher education gap in Scotland is twice as bad as that in England and a commissioner must be appointed urgently to reduce the inequality, a report has found.
Published today, the Access in Scotland report provides new analysis of official data showing young people from the five wealthiest areas are four times more likely to enter university than those in the bottom five. The equivalent figure in England is 2.4 times. The Sutton Trust, which aims to improve social mobility through education, is urging the “speedy appointment” of an independent Commissioner for Fair Access.
The call echoes recommendations made by the the Commission on Widening Access, established by Nicola Sturgeon in 2014 to work out a blueprint on closing the gap.
On Wednesday the First Minister announced this will go ahead as part of a major package aimed at driving up attainment for all.
Today Sir Peter Lampl, chairman of the Sutton Trust, says the report findings prove just how necessary this is. He said: “Scotland faces a shocking access gap and it is vital that the government appoints a strong independent commissioner without delay.
“There is good practice in Scottish universities on access, but we need a really strong push if talent is not to be wasted. It is vital that access to higher education improves to the best universities and that there is a role for clearer contextual admissions.”
Led by Professor Sheila Riddell of of Edinburgh University, the report found 90 per cent of growth in higher education places for disadvantaged students in the last ten years has been provided by colleges, not universities.
Although Scots are more likely than their English counterparts to enter some form of higher education, they are less likely to be able to go straight to university and many of those that do so through such ‘articulation’ often have to repeat at least one year.
However, disadvantaged Scottish students are more likely to enter a leading “higher tariff” university like Aberdeen, Glasgow or St Andrews than those in England and Scottish Government moves to award 720 additional places to such institutions for those from the most deprived areas was judged “particularly important”.
But based on a social class measure rather than neighbourhood data, the report suggests that there has been “no narrowing of the gap” between those students from managerial and professional family backgrounds and those from working class family backgrounds in Scotland since 1996. Riddell said: “Despite free tuition, the Scottish university sector has much work to do in order to realise the goal of fair access. The supply of university places in Scotland has not kept pace with rising demand, with detrimental consequences for less advantaged students. The growing tendency of students from privileged backgrounds to occupy the lion’s share of places in Scottish ancient universities is also noted.”
Umbrella group Universities Scotland said: “What is clear from the Sutton Trust’s analysis is that England’s policy of uncapped places has made it easier to get into university and this has helped access.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here