THE Edinburgh International Festival is to be targeted this weekend by a theatrical protest against sponsorship by the oil giant BP, which is blamed for climate pollution.
Environmentalists, fringe performers and arts sponsorship campaigners accuse the festival of “green-washing” a company contributing to “catastrophic climate change” by accepting it as one of the festival’s headline partners. They say they are planning a “pop-up performance protest” at an undisclosed location in Edinburgh at noon on Sunday.
The organisers, an activist theatre group called BP or not BP?, have previously disrupted events sponsored by BP at the British Museum and the Tate gallery in London. In May they invaded the British Museum with a singing show in which wildlife were trapped in an oil slick of black umbrellas.
They have also brought Sherlock Holmes to the museum in search of “the world’s biggest corporate criminal”, and put BP on trial with a public flashmob. Last year they staged a surprise performance of an anti-oil version of Shakespeare’s Macbeth in a Tate Britain art exhibition funded and branded by BP.
Campaigners are concerned that cultural institutions are giving BP legitimacy while it extracts unsustainable amounts of fossil fuels and lobbies against effective political action on climate change. They point out that the company was fined a record $18.7 billion (£12bn) in July for its role in the Deepwater Horizon oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010.
Jess Worth from BP or not BP? said: “Organisations of all kinds – from pension funds to churches to the Rockefeller Foundation – are now severing their ties with fossil fuel companies. If the EIF doesn’t drop its oily sponsor soon it will look embarrassingly out of touch.”
She was backed by environmental groups in Scotland. “World-class performers haven’t come to Edinburgh this August to make the oil industry look good,” said Ric Lander from Friends of the Earth Scotland. “Let’s clean up the EIF and stop BP buying prestige at the expense of Scotland’s treasured public arts.”
Fringe performers also weighed in. “For me, art is a way of asking questions about this world and imagining a better one,” said Daniel Bye, whose show, Going Viral, is playing at Summerhall. “It doesn’t help for the greatest arts festival in the world to be sponsored by an organisation actively committed to making the world worse.”
The author Caryl Churchill, who has a play about corporate sponsorship on at Underbelly, argued that oil companies used the arts to improve their image and lobbying power. “Tobacco companies used to do this until arts organisations decided they didn’t want to endorse something that caused death,” she said. “Now it’s time to stop promoting fossil fuels.”
BP has sponsored the Edinburgh International Festival for 34 years, but neither the company nor the festival would say how much money has been involved. After a prolonged freedom of information battle, the Tate disclosed earlier this year that it had received £3.8 million from BP over 17 years, while the British Museum said it had been given £6.5m over 11 years.
An EIF spokesperson said: “We are grateful to all of the public and private sector organisations who support the festival and make it possible for us to present world-class work to the widest possible audience. We also support free speech and the right to peaceful protest.”
David Nicholas, a spokesman for BP, declined to comment on the company’s environmental performance. “As a significant investor in Scotland, BP has been pleased to support the world-renowned Edinburgh International Festival in a variety of ways for many years,” he told The National. “We are delighted to continue our support this year, joining a broad cross-section of businesses and community partners.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here