“Jeremy Corbyn has been endorsed by UB40. Surely this will bolster his chances of success in the Labour leadership contest?” Will, Govanhill
I’M not so sure about that, Will. While, on the surface of it, Corbyn appears to have been endorsed by English reggae act UB40, it should be noted that UB40 are just as divided a band as the Labour Party are a political organisation. While this seems oddly fitting, the comical synchronicity seen in this endorsement will not have left many Jeremy Corbyn fans dancing in the street.
On Tuesday afternoon, Jeremy Corbyn held a press conference in Birmingham with one incarnation of UB40. Many readers will know UB40, fondly or otherwise, for such hits as Red Red Wine and Food For Thought. However, their relevance with regards to modern day politics is questionable at best.
While no one can fault their socialist convictions, anyone under 40 will probably have to ask their parents to learn about the band. As far as strange pairings go, this is almost on par with Jim Murphy and Eddie Izzard in 2015.
Worse still was the use of the “UB4Corbyn” hashtag at the press conference. Given that “UB40” was the code for unemployment benefit forms in the 1980s, Owen Smith’s campaign team must’ve been beside themselves with laughter, while Twitter, as ever, was awash with witty and sardonic remarks about Britain under Corbyn’s leadership.
Following the press conference, the other UB40 incarnation – also known as UB40 – expressed their support for the Labour Party, but not explicitly for Corbyn. While Owen Smith cannot claim this as a resounding victory for his cause, there’s every chance that he will try to anyway. In this instance, Smith may actually benefit from keeping his mouth shut. I wouldn’t be surprised in the slightest, however, if Owen chose to seek endorsement from Simply Red.
Ultimately, Corbyn may have scored an own goal in using a band with a history of acrimonious fallouts to promote unity and strength in the Labour party. In addition, it’d probably be fair to say that associating himself with a popular-with-parents brand of British reggae music is not going to do a great deal for his street cred. Personally, I would urge Corbyn to start listening to The Wildhearts, Motörhead and AC/DC and possibly consider a “Corbyn Rocks!” campaign as a means of recovering from this embarrassing incident.
“What role do you think the US presidential race will play in regard to Brexit and Scottish independence?” Bill, Dundee
DONALD Trump and Hillary Clinton are presently neck and neck in their race for the White House. We will know in early November who comes out victorious, and the winner will have a considerable impact on the current Brexit negotiations. The outgoing President Obama has made it public that he believes Britain made the wrong choice in voting to leave the EU, and it seems likely that fellow Democrat Hillary would share such a view. However, Donald Trump has been notoriously anti-EU during his campaign, going so far as to mingle with Nigel Farage in what can only be described as a meeting of the mindless.
Should Trump become President, it would seem logical that his demented brain would seek to aid Britain in the wake of its Brexit decision. This could prove significant as we hurtle towards the implementation of Article 50. As it stands, Theresa May, who voted Remain, is in a situation where nobody expects her to succeed in making Brexit a success. Indeed, the odds are so insurmountably stacked against her that even producing a Brexit of passable stability would be perceived as a triumph. A Trump victory in the US election could lend itself to this very scenario.
The expectation is that the initiation of Article 50 will be utterly disastrous, so if the combined efforts of Malevolent May and Tyrannical Trump can somehow make it work, it could be the unravelling of the entire Eurozone project. This is something that Donald Trump would very much like to see.
As far as Scottish independence goes, it could be a mistake to simply assume the consequences of Brexit are readily predictable. The SNP have a poor track record when it comes to blind assumption, most notably in regard to the oil industry and Named Person scheme. The best thing Nicola Sturgeon can do right now is stalk her prey, not strike.
There is the distinct possibility that Brexit will be the sword that the United Kingdom falls on. However, we do not know this for certain. All we have right now is the knowledge of a democratic deficit between Scotland and England. If Donald Trump is elected in November, it will radically change the Brexit game.
Similarly, if Hillary Clinton becomes President, we will better be able to predict the consequences of Article 50 for Scotland.
It does seem quite surreal that leaders of the United States should play any role in the politics of the United Kingdom, but this is the state we’re in right now.
Politics is a game of poker, and Scotland played a blinder against Westminster with the Remain vote earlier this year. However, it was not the winning hand. Right now we need to watch our opponent closely and see if, and how, they can get themselves out of a losing predicament. If they fail to outmanoeuvre us on the EU matter, Scottish independence could be within our grasp. However, if Theresa May is somehow able to get the Brexit Titanic back to shore, it could level the playing field once again. The US presidency could ultimately prove to be the wildcard in the deck, one that could turn out to be an unwanted joker or an illicit ace. Only time will tell.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here