IT’S the economy, stoopid. Aye, it is great and very necessary to have a debate on the economy, stoopid. Every nation should have one. Any democracy will naturally have different views on that. That is why we have elections and different parties. So why should Scotland be any different?
The trouble is that we have three allegedly different same parties all united in one thing: Scotland is entitled to nothing. Zero. Zilch. Anyone saying different is automatically baad. No country in the world, except Scotland, bottled it on the question of what kind currency we might have after independence. Ireland didn’t give a damn and adopted the pound Sterling for years anyway, until they agreed on something else to suit.
The word Sterling is from the toon o’ Stirling, where Scotland had one of its royal mints. One of the many broken articles in the Treaty of the so-called “Union” takeover was that Scotland should retain its own mint: another promise with hole in it.
We actually had the inhabitants of the black hole of London, where oor taxes go, say that Scotland could not have independence because of its black hole. Or at least, that was what a supermercat checkoot guy telt me, when I asked why they don’t have enough copies of The National. What black hole? We don’t even have a nation to have a national debt, holy or otherwise.
The basic essentials for human life are food, clothing, shelter and in caulder climates, fuel. Scotland has an abundance of all the resources we need for that, so why the shortage?
We could afford to feed ourselves daily four times over and still have a surplus. In terms of shelter, with only five million puir souls we do not have a population pressure for land. It is owned by a few absentee landlords. They spend most of their time avoiding the place and come back for the Glorious Twelfth to shoot the peasants jumping oot as their low-paid ghillies beat the heather.
House prices here are determined not by materials and labour, but by market values. A broom cupboard in the centre of London is worth much more than a hoose halfway up Ben Stoorie.
As for fuel, name one oil-rich country that is actually poorer for discovering oil, apart from Nigeria. We are fuel rich but don’t have corruption here. Do we?
We have all the resources we need and more. Problem is, we don’t own it. So like everything else, the argument has to move from the dismal science to the political. How do we manage and allocate these resources? Since we don’t, the question is academic. Since we must get the country first, the question is political. Do we have a capitalist economy Mickey Fry-style and let the de’il tak the hindmaist? Or, do we have a communist economy? A mixed economy? Or do we have a “third way” that is allegedly neither communism or capitalism?
The occupying forces in Europe ran a military-style command economy, taking over all the public services and supplies. It worked. General Eisenhower from commander to president gave jobs, housing, education, welfare etc to his returning vets. General MacArthur just wanted to nuke the Chinese Commies during the Korean aftermath.
Now we don’t know if Boris or Donald have the nerve to nuke guinness-knows-who? Still, oor ain wee chez nuke base 20-odd mile frae Glesga is only there for economic reasons, according to the sitting MSP Jackie Baillie, just to give jobs to the local economy.
If we put ten economists in a ferret sack and asked them one simple question, we would have ten different complicated, weasel-like answers and a black hole in the grun. It’s the economy, stoopid.
Donald Anderson
Glasgow
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel