FRIDAY April 13 is an important anniversary in Scotland.
Nineteen years ago, just two weeks before the opening of the first Scottish Parliament, the UK Labour party passed the Scottish Adjacent Waters Boundaries Order 1999.
This annexed 6000sq miles of Scottish waters and transferred them from the original internationally agreed boundary to English jurisdiction.
It was no coincidence that the area just happened to contain six oil wells!
The real disgrace here is how every single Labour MP and every single member of the Labour hierarchy in Scotland let this attempt at cheating Scotland out of some of its oil and gas wealth go without a single cheep of protest.
How can we trust Westminster – especially now in the throes of a Tory power grab – to look after Scotland’s best interests in the future when they failed us so badly in the past?
David McCann
Alloa
READING The National of Friday April 6 I noted that the long letter from correspondent John Andrews was a peon devoted to the death warrants of as many living creatures as could be encompassed (Grouse shooting is a boon for wildlife and rural communities).
Advocates of the torture, mutilation and destruction of living creatures for money often seek to launder their cruelty in fabrications gilded in whichever smokescreen (usually conservation) as can usefully serve.
Like the case of the National Rifle Association in America which organisation lauds the right to bear arms, but falls silent on the greater right to life.
John Andrews constructs an encirclement of torture and destruction. It is a structure constructed in language and enforced in pain, suffering and death. Regard how his letter designates selected sentient creatures as a “crop”.
This squalid manoeuvre is camouflage. It explains Mr Andrews curious lapse when listing causes of mortality in persecuted birds of prey. The word missing from his list was the word poison.
Those unlucky enough to be within Mr Andrews encirclement may find themselves designated (Mr Andrew’s words) as a “legitimate target”. Thus the degraded lexicon of computer gaming serves the wilful, casual destruction of life. Mr Andrews donned his camouflage once again in the offering of his dissembling phrase “fieldsports”.
Mr Andrews, in this, there is no sport, but there is much blood, degradation, destruction and suffering.
You will find these words in your dictionary in close proximity to the words compassion and empathy.
Those who patrol and enforce this encirclement of persecution will bring us all, in this proxy war on nature, to destruction. A choice, therefore, for humanity – an encirclement of compassion, or a scorched earth and prison of delusion?
Keith Steiner
Aberdeenshire
IT SHOCKS me how little awareness we have of Scotland’s sovereignty and how the current Russia-phobic hysteria are inexorably linked.
Brexit will undoubtedly invoke a second independence referendum, in which all recent polls suggest growing support for Yes. However, the UK Government can stop any referendum in its tracks, and also legally dissolve the Scottish Parliament at any time it chooses if it can present an absolute cast iron case for doing so.
This can only be done by the UK Supreme Court, which still has absolute power over English and Scottish law. Lord Smith of Kelvin stated this openly in an article in The Herald in December 2014, quoting: “Yes the Government can do this, but they would suffer a plague of boils if they did”.
What other reason would they need than the nuclear weapons facility on the Clyde and a synthetically made superpower enemy such as Russia.
The Clyde would once again then be “essential” for “British national security” and for the strength of the Nato alliance.
Nato states, which are clearly only vassals of the US have already shown their hand by linking arms in open provocation of the Russian Federation in, thanks to Boris Johnson, undoubtedly the most botched-up, amateurish, false flag operation in history.
They will also support the British state in everything and anything it does, and it is just naivety to think otherwise.
Russia-gate is a British state-manufactured premise to the Brexit car crash that is rapidly approaching and the constitutional chaos that will then ensue.
The British state, the monarchy and the existing London political hegemony must survive Brexit at all costs, and do any of you think that deceit of this magnitude is beyond this ultra-right Tory Cabinet’s consciousness?
Graeme Goodall
Address supplied
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel