REGARDING refutation of organised pro-Union letters in local newspapers, may I thank Mr Rory Bulloch (Letters, February 16) for his kind words.
Also, on Satyrday, JF Davidson of Bonnyrigg eloquently explains why it is so tedious to do this necessary work (Letters, February 17). I add to his description. It must be honest and accurate if it is not to descend to the level of throwing back the same mud.
There is the depressing feeling that much irrevocable damage has already been inflicted and there is also fear of the mighty financial resources of the Unionists to initiate and support a legal case (although the editorial staff are of course wary of this), and there is a fear of more personal attack in verbal smear.
Principle and honesty are one of our few weapons. Nicola Sturgeon, John Swinney and an overwhelming number of our MPs and MSPs understand and demonstrate that very well.
Scotland in Union letter-writers were exposed by what Stuart Campbell of Wings over Scotland calls “an alert reader” who intercepted an email with a named list of addressees (email addresses correctly redacted) crowing at the number of successful letters published in local newspapers.
I submit that these people have forfeited any right to be taken seriously by the public and the electorate of Scotland.
Victor Moncrieff
Lanark
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel