OPPOSITION in Scotland to the controversial Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) is growing, almost daily it seems. Local groups opposing TTIP are springing up across the country.
At the last count there were groups in Aberdeen, St Andrews, Dundee, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Inverness, Fife and the Highlands.
Next weekend the nationwide ‘Scotland Against TTIP’ coalition holds its launch event.
The coalition is a far-reaching alliance of fourteen organisations, including seven trades union bodies, environment and food organisations, and social justice and anti-austerity campaigners.
We expect that the coalition will grow, as more and more people realise that Scotland’s democratic powers could be traded away.
TTIP is being touted as a trade deal; something that’ll allow goods to flow more easily between the EU and US. But it’s much more than that. TTIP is a transfer of power from democratically elected governments to transnational corporations on a scale not seen before.
Its aim is to reduce or take away barriers to trade. But since trade tariffs between the EU and US are already very low, what this really means is that standards and regulations put in place by governments to protect public health, the environment, workers’ rights and many other things could be targeted.
Supporters of TTIP call this “levelling the playing field” but it will actually create an unbalanced system that favours transnational companies. It will give them freedom of movement for capital, goods, and services, as well as the ability to sue governments in secret courts, but will ask nothing of them in return.
Under TTIP, it’s conceivable that the Scottish Government could be sued by transnational companies if they perceive their profits to be threatened by its public policy decisions.
So, US oil and gas companies, for example, might sue over the moratorium on fracking, or if regulations on climate change emissions were tightened. Or big tobacco might do the same if further smoking bans or tighter tobacco-control regulations were brought in.
And Scotland’s treasured public services, such as the NHS and Scottish Water, could also be at risk. Where there is privatisation in any part of Scotland’s public services, then TTIP could mean contracts being opened up to US companies.
The UK Government, in its support for TTIP, is negotiating away Scotland’s power to protect its natural heritage, its public services and the health of its people, and is handing power to big business. It’s vital the Scottish Government and Scottish politicians say no to TTIP.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here