WE’VE found the whole debate around the Scottish Six a little bit bemusing this week.

Having followed the story with keen interest, we’re still confused as to how anybody can think it’s a bad thing.

We do understand the frustrations of staff at BBC Scotland, who appear to have had this thrust on them with little consultation and a lot of disrespect by their London colleagues.

If it was put to them with a little more courtesy, we're sure they’d be delighted by the opportunity to have £5 million a year to spend producing a Scottish-based hourly news show.

And to those Unionists who believe that because the SNP want something it must be a terrifying prospect and sure to lead to the break-up of their beloved nation, well, we’re not sure that we’d ever be able to convince them.

As for the concerns raised by those on our side of the argument?

Like most of our readers, we have our issues with how our public broadcaster covered the referendum. But we’re sure you’d agree that BBC Scotland, for the most part, handled it a hell of a lot better than London HQ. Why not let them handle the whole shebang?

We enjoyed broadcaster Stuart Cosgrove’s piece on Bella Caledonia at the weekend, “Don’t Cringe in My Backyard”, in which he drew up a rough running order of what a well-resourced, competently made Scottish Six might look like.

It seemed interesting, informative and something we’d enjoy watching. We hope it happens.


Tom Devine: Why we need a Scottish Six