IN THIS digital age most of us are adept at coping with constant change – new software, apps, websites, computers, or other new devices.
How odd then that the energy company E.ON, which presumably has a substantial technical department, says it can’t “absorb the cost” of adapting its accounts system to accept a .scot email suffix.
Andy Anderson tried to register his .scot address with the company to allow him to access his account, but met with such resistance that he ended up seeking the help of the ombudsman.
That too proved a dead end, with the ombudsman reporting that E.ON said there was “a significant cost” involved and not enough demand to absorb this.
The investigating officer added: “As this is a commercial decision, it is outside of our remit,” which left Anderson feeling as if he had been discriminated against.
Now, we are no technological masterminds, but we feel we could offer E.ON a pointer or two to save them some money.
We went to Mr Google and typed in an eight-word search string (which the techies will have to work out themselves) which returned more than 74,000,000 results. Another, more specific string returned only 250,000 results.
Many of those we examined were virtual idiots’ guides to accepting new domains and suffixes on a mail server. We are sure E.ON’s techies could find among them simple instructions to completing the task for little, or no cost.
It could send out a simple but powerful message that the company was not discriminating against anyone because of their email address.
MSP attacks E.ON over refusal to accept .scot email suffix because it would cost too much
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here