WITH one week to go until the fourth session of the Scottish Parliament ends, the Land Reform Bill was agreed to yesterday. This Bill is important and marks a watershed in land relations in Scotland. Although no one measure is of itself very radical, taken together, this is a significant piece of legislation.
The commitment to establishing a Land Rights and Responsibilities Statement and a Scottish Land Commission will do nothing directly to change the pattern of landownership. But it is an important move to ensure that land reform remains on the political agenda in future. This in itself may well turn out to be the most enduring legacy of the Bill. One of the reasons this legislation has taken so long to arrive is because the Scottish Government abandoned land reform in 2007 and didn’t get going on the topic again until 2012. Land reform will not happen without sustained, determined and vigorous effort.
Other measures in the Bill, such as bringing shooting estates and deer forests back in to the non-domestic rating system are welcome, but only serve to highlight the fact that amendments to do the same for vacant and derelict land were defeated. Transparency has been one of the topics in the Bill that has attracted greatest public attention. Again, proposals to bar ownership of land by companies registered in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies were defeated and, instead, regulations are to be introduced in the next Parliament.
Tenant farmers emerge as one group who can sleep easier at night, thanks to a substantial strengthening of their rights and the Scottish Government is to be commended on the manner in which it stood up to sustained lobbying from landed interests. Smallholders, however remain the poor relation of the tenanted class, with none of the rights that have been granted to crofters and tenants since 1999.
Communities, too, have a new suite of rights to acquire land that they need for sustainable development.
Adding to a growing body of rights, the legislative landscape is now rather complicated for voluntary community groups to navigate and ensuring that people have the knowledge and capacity to exercise these new rights remains a significant challenge.
Altogether, this is a historic piece of legislation.
Land reform is back and the opportunities and challenges for the next Parliament are to enact the voluminous secondary legislation to make the Bill work and to bring forward further reform on the wide range of land reform topics not captured in this Bill such as inheritance law land taxation, land information, housing, compulsory purchase and Crown land governance.
The level of engagement with the legislative process has been encouraging and MSPs such as Sarah Boyack, Patrick Harvie and Mike Russell have all worked hard to strengthen what started as a much-less-ambitious Bill. Land reform is a generational project.
Much remains to be done over the next 20 years, but this is as good a start as could have been hoped for.
Lesley Riddoch: Massively rushed Bill is not perfect – but it’s a good start
MSPs back Land Reform Bill after marathon debate
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here