LLOYDS Banking Group is to close 49 branches and axe almost 100 jobs in a move that unions have branded as “unnecessary”.
Branches under the Halifax, Bank of Scotland and Lloyds brands will be affected, resulting in 99 job losses.
The lender said the group was embarking on the closure programme partly in response to changing customer behaviour and the declining number of transactions being made in branches.
A Lloyds spokesman said: “Customers are increasingly choosing to use digital and mobile channels for their everyday banking needs.
“As a consequence, the number of customers visiting some of our branches has declined in recent years.
“In response to this, we have confirmed the locations of some branches which will close next year across Lloyds Bank, Halifax and Bank of Scotland.”
Lloyds insisted that branches remain a “key part of the service” it offers.
Earlier this year, the lender said it would shut down 100 branches as it swung the axe on 200 jobs.
But union Unite reacted with fury, saying the move undermined growth and would leave more communities without access to “valued local banking”.
Rob MacGregor, Unite national officer, said: “Lloyds Banking Group needs to halt this unnecessary bank branch closure programme.
“Local communities are making it clear that the closure of their local branch excludes customers who cannot use digital means to conduct their financial transactions.
“Having returned to profitability Lloyds needs to stop ignoring its corporate social responsibilities.”
The bank unveiled a hefty rise in third-quarter profits last month as the once state-backed lender hailed a “strong financial performance”.
The company saw pre-tax profits more than double to £1.95 billion as chief executive Antonio Horta-Osorio’s turnaround of the lender continues.
The results built on a strong run of form for Lloyds, which was fully returned to private hands in May, nearly nine years after the Government bailed it out at the height of the financial crisis.
At the peak, Lloyds was 43 per cent owned by the state following its bailout during the banking crisis, after taxpayers were forced to inject £20.3 billion into rescuing the bank.
The group has also been dogged by PPI claims, having paid out over £18bn to date to affected customers.
Meanwhile, the former chairman of Lloyds has told the High Court that if it had not proceeded with the acquisition of HBOS, UK banks “may not have been able to open on Monday morning”.
Sir Victor Blank was being questioned by lawyers for a group of 5803 former Lloyds TSB shareholders who claim they were “mugged” when the bank recommended the January 2009 deal without disclosing HBOS’s true financial state.
They are suing Sir Victor, Lloyds Banking Group, ex-chief executive Eric Daniels, former chief financial officer Tim Tookey, one-time director of retail banking Helen Weir, and ex-director of wholesale banking George Truett Tate over alleged losses of more than £550 million.
Richard Hill QC has claimed the directors recommended the “disastrous” acquisition, knowing that HBOS was on “emergency life support” from the Bank of England and Lloyds.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here