BANKS headquartered in the UK will need to find an extra £4 billion to help protect British taxpayers from being forced to fund another round of bailouts, the Bank of England has said.
Estimates released by the Bank show an industry-wide shortfall in the amount that banks, building societies and investment firms need to hold in order to meet new guidelines known as the minimum requirement for eligible liabilities and own funds (MREL), set to come into force in 2022.
Firms will be required to restructure a total of £116bn worth of existing debt, but are currently facing a net shortfall of £4bn in order to meet the new regulations, the consultation document explained.
MREL forces banks to hold enough money to absorb losses, which could be drawn down in the face of collapse to finance an orderly wind-down.
UK banks have already been building up significant balance sheet buffers since the 2008 financial crisis to meet new rules.
MREL requirements aim to help avoid another round of bank bailouts, as seen during the last financial crisis when the UK Government was forced to step in and save Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds Banking Group, spending £46 million and £20.5bn respectively of taxpayer cash.
The Government also made moves to nationalise both Northern Rock and Bradford & Bingley during the crash.
While the Bank warned that the MREL safeguards could ultimately increase the cost of lending for consumers, and may have a “negative effect on investment and the level of GDP (gross domestic product)”, it suggested those costs were worth the benefits.
“Ensuring that institutions have sufficient loss-absorbing capacity in resolution is necessary to make resolution credible without public capital support and therefore to end the ‘too big to fail’ problem,” the paper explained. “It can also ensure the continuity of critical functions and reduce uncertainty associated with institution failures.”
While administrative costs of implementing MREL will vary for each firm, it explained that they are likely to be one-off costs that would be relatively straight forward for banks to absorb.
The Bank said MREL also creates an incentive for banks to avoid “excessive risks”, since the cost of a collapse will be shouldered by creditors rather than public funds.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here