UNIVERSITY of Dundee research is the best in the UK at influencing innovation, according to a new report published yesterday.
The Nature Index 2017 Innovation supplement sheds new light on the impact academic research is having on innovation by examining how research articles are cited in third-party patents across the world.
By looking at patents owned by third parties – informed by and citing academic work – rather than those held by institutions themselves, the influence of research on the development of products and services is exposed.
The supplement’s tables contain some of the key academic players whose ideas may shape tomorrow’s inventions. Dundee is the only UK university ranked in the global top 50, at 26th place. The University of Cambridge (51st) is the next highest-ranked institution from the UK. The Scripps Research Institute in San Diego was ranked 1st. Thirty-eight of the top 50 places are occupied by institutions in the US.
Professor Sir Pete Downes, Principal of the University, said, “This is excellent recognition for the impact of research carried out at Dundee. Earlier this year we were ranked among the 25 most innovative universities in Europe, and first in Scotland. This latest accolade demonstrates how we are contributing to the goal of making Scotland one of the most innovative places to work and to develop a business.
“We are delighted that work carried out at Dundee, across different subject areas and very often involving researchers from disparate disciplines working together, is having such an impact on third-party patents.”
First launched in November 2014, the Nature Index database tracks the author affiliations of research articles published in high-quality natural science journals. The Innovation tables rank institutions by a metric developed by The Lens, a free, open and secure global organisation that creates applications to map the networks of influence of scholarship.
The Normalized Lens Influence Metric provides a measure of the influence an institution’s research has had on innovation by calculating the citations of research articles in patents owned by third parties. The metric has been derived for 200 high performing institutions that appear in the top 100 of at least one of a number of institutional rankings (Nature Index, Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU), Thomson Innovation or the Leiden Ranking).
From April 2016 to March 2017, 99 University of Dundee papers appeared in the Nature Index – seven in Chemistry, 70 in Life Sciences, 19 in Physical Sciences and three in Earth and Environmental Sciences.
David Swinbanks, founder of the Nature Index, said, “This analysis comes at a time when following the transfer of scientific knowledge into industry and the economy is a growing priority for governments and research funding agencies. For them, the need to demonstrate that publicly funded science is being used for society’s benefit is paramount.
“This innovation supplement is part of a wider effort from the Nature Index to examine new trends in research publishing and its interface with sectors outside of academia.”
Nature Index data is also presented for the 200 institutions ranked by The Lens. For the first time, Nature Index data has been normalised against the total research output of an institution in the natural sciences.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here