WHISKY exports have risen by four per cent to more than £4 billion, marking a return to growth for the sector.
The Scotch Whisky Association said the increase means it is “optimistic about the future” but called for a sector deal for Scotland’s national drink in Brexit negotiations to help combat uncertainty.
The association’s 2016 report found overseas sales of whisky rose by £153 million from 2015 to £4,008,927,149 last year.
The number of bottles dispatched increased by 4.8 per cent between 2015 and 2016 to more than £1.2bn, meaning almost 39 bottles worth a total of £127 were exported per second.
Both the value and volume of Scotch exports returned to positive annual growth rates for the first time since 2011.
Single malt exports were worth more than £1bn for the first time, up by almost 12 per cent on 2015 to £1.02bn, the equivalent of 113 million bottles.
However, blends remain the biggest export category, accounting for 69 per cent of exports in 2016.
Last year, Scotch remained the biggest net contributor to the UK’s balance of trade in goods and without its benefit the UK trade in goods deficit would have been 2.8% larger at almost £139 billion.
The drink accounted for more a fifth of the UK’s total food and drink exports and 73 per cent of the sector in Scotland, with the EU remaining the top destination, followed by the US, which took exports worth more than £1 billion.
SWA acting chief executive Julie Hesketh-Laird said: “With Scotch whisky exports returning to growth and rising to more than £4 billion, and single malts exceeding £1 billion for the first time, we’re feeling optimistic about the future.
“Demand is rising in mature markets, such as the US, and newer markets, including China.
“This confidence is reflected in the number of new distilleries - 14 have been opened in the last few years and we know of about another 40 at various stages of planning.
“However, we have to be alert to the challenges, as well as the opportunities, of Brexit and political changes in the UK and across the globe.
“Industry success can’t be taken for granted and we need both the UK and Scottish governments to work in partnership with us to deliver a business environment - at home and overseas - that supports sustainable growth.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here