LARGE firms would be forced to publish full tax returns under Labour plans to expose “sweetheart deals” and tackle avoidance.
The proposal would apply to firms with more than 250 employees and follows criticism of the tax affairs of giant companies. Shadow chancellor John McDonnell said the measure would help close down “loopholes and scams”.
HM Revenue and Customs estimates the tax gap – the shortfall between tax collected and what might be expected – to be £36 billion, with £9.5bn attributed to large companies.
Labour also highlighted the estimated £13 trillion worldwide hidden in tax havens and claimed that if the Exchequer could receive a fraction of this amount, it would end austerity.
McDonnell said: “Tax avoidance is a scourge on society that company secrecy laws help facilitate, and one which the Tories have done nothing to tackle.
“Labour will pour the disinfectant of sunlight on large company accounts, helping close down the loopholes and the scams that the tax dodgers rely on.
“The Tories are running a rigged economy for the super-rich and giant corporate tax dodgers.
“Only Labour will stand up for workers and small businesses to make our tax system fair and protect our public services such as education and the NHS.”
Under Labour’s plans, the requirement to file tax returns at Companies House along with annual accounts would apply to firms with a turnover of more than £36 million, a balance sheet or more than £18m or more than 250 employees.
Labour argued that while large companies may be able to hire accountants and lawyers, “wine-and-dine senior civil servants and other policymakers”, many comparatively small companies are not in a position to secure any “sweetheart deals”. The publication of large company tax returns and related correspondence would expose any such deals, they said.
When Parliament returns after the Easter recess on Tuesday, Labour will also push to strengthen measures to tackle tax avoidance in the Finance Bill.
Shadow chief secretary Peter Dowd said: “The measures in the Finance Bill claiming to close tax loopholes do not go far enough and have gaping omissions – another Tory conjuring trick to hide their inaction in making sure that everyone, including the rich, pays their fair share of society’s upkeep.
“There is nothing in the government’s proposals to address the chronic lack of enforcement in the context of the wider regulatory problems. As usual, the Tories are playing rhetorically to the gallery.”
The plan was dismissed by the Conservatives, who said Labour’s proposals for tax and spending would damage business.
Tory vice-chairman Stuart Andrew said: “Labour’s plan for our high streets would see corporation tax going back up to 28 per cent and £500bn of extra debt, all under a Labour leader who said that we should not be afraid of debt or borrowing.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel