SMALL firms in Scotland are at risk of collapse because public bodies are withholding £120 million of debts owed to private construction companies.
According to research carried out by industry body the Specialist Engineering Contractors (SEC) Group
Scotland, “little effort” is being made to ensure secondary or sub-contractors get the same treatment as primary contractors who are paid within 30 days.
The primary reason for withholding the cash is to improve the public bodies’ working capital. But SEC, which delivers nearly two-fifths of the £4 billion spent by the public sector in Scotland, insists delays are putting small firms at risk of insolvency.
Figures also revealed that 72 per cent of public bodies and almost two-thirds (64 per cent) of universities make no attempt to monitor supply chain payments, according to SEC.
Newell McGuiness, managing director of SEC member Select, said: “This information makes very depressing reading.
“It suggests that while organisations which depend on money from the public purse would appear on the surface to be backing moves against late payment, the reality is somewhat different.
“The Scottish Government has wholeheartedly endorsed industry’s appeals to help small firms by the simple expedient of prompt payment.
“It now needs to enforce that across the bodies for whose funding it is responsible.”
SEC has called for a common start date for the 30-day payment period for primary and secondary suppliers, and mandatory project bank accounts so that the supply chain can be paid directly.
Organisations which fail to pay their supply chain should be excluded from public-sector work for 12 months and an ombudsman should be appointed to monitor payment practices, SEC said.
Eddie Myles, chairman of SEC Group Scotland, said: “The regulator or ombudsman must have the power to challenge poor practices and to order those public bodies who don’t meet the standards to change their ways.
“There is an expectation in Scotland that construction SMEs will invest in skills and training and smart technologies, with the efficiencies created directly benefiting the public sector."
The Scottish Government said it was “committed to ensuring that procurement guidelines on pay are adhered to and that companies are paid on time, because we understand how important this is to the financial future of smaller firms”.
A spokesman said: “The Scottish government has been co-ordinating trials of Project Bank Accounts (PBAs), which are ring-fenced accounts that payments can be made directly and simultaneously by a client to contractors and sub-contractors, improving cash flow through the supply chain.
“Our focus on prompt supply chain payment will continue, and we will work closely with our delivery partners in other pilot projects to build positively on what we have learned through our experience.
"The Scottish Government is absolutely committed to ensuring every pound spent on infrastructure investment goes as far as possible to support businesses and jobs, building greater resilience into the broader Scottish economy.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here