The Scottish Football Supporters’ Association has urged authorities to take strong measures against the use of pyrotechnics in Scottish football.
Following several potentially traumatic incidents at stadiums this season, notably one where a 10-year-old Dundee fan suffered injuries during a match against St Johnstone, the supporters group has cautioned that failure to properly enforce regulations regarding pyrotechnics could lead to a fatal incident involving spectators.
“It is only by luck that no-one has been even more seriously hurt or indeed lost their life,” read a statement from the SFSA.
“Those old enough to remember the Bradford disaster (in 1985) will recall that it was caused by a lit cigarette.
“Millions of cigarettes had been smoked up to that point in football grounds, but it only took one to kill 56 and injure a further 265.
READ MORE: Manchester United boss provides Scott McTominay injury return update
“Proponents of pyros will tell us that modern grounds are made of concrete and won’t burn, but human beings burn easily at low temperatures (just above 44C for the skin to start to burn) – as do their clothes and, moreover, there are many old stands in Scotland that are still made of wood, while plastic burns at a temperature far less than that of the so-called safe (500C) pyros.”
The SFSA claims 65 per cent of fans believe the use of pyrotechnics at matches detracts from the overall spectator experience.
“In our view, the case against pyros is overwhelming,” it added. “While we acknowledge that a minority of (mainly young, almost exclusively male) fans find excitement in their use, the dangers are simply not worth the risk.
“Consequently, it is incumbent on the SFA (Scottish Football Association), the SPFL (Scottish Professional Football League) and all the clubs to enforce the law in the same way they do for cigarette smoking, racist or other discriminatory remarks.
“If they don’t then there is a grim inevitability that one day in the future someone will die as a result of illegal pyrotechnics at a football match.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel