EQUAL marriage laws for gay people may not pass in Scotland if the legislation was going through Holyrood today due to the “toxic” level of debate, Nicola Sturgeon has said.
The former first minister made the comments as she appeared alongside former deputy first minister Jim Wallace, who is now a LibDem peer, at an event organised by the School of Social and Political Science at the University of Edinburgh.
They reflected on the 25 years since the Scottish Parliament was established, discussing how politics had evolved and what the future may hold.
In comments reported by The Scotsman, Sturgeon said she was not sure that some policies which the Holyrood parliament has approved in the past would be approved again today.
READ MORE: Unionist peers form cross-party group 'to rein in SNP spending on independence'
The former SNP leader told the event: "The culture, at times, in politics is downright unpleasant. It's downright toxic."
She went on: "I was the minister that took through minimum unit pricing. I don't think that would get through and onto the statute book today.
“I'm not even convinced equal marriage would – certainly not without a much more toxic debate – get there today.
"So a lot of it comes back to, how do we fix that underlying problem of we've just lost our way in how to debate things rationally and properly."
Same-sex marriage was made legal in Scotland in early 2014.
The SNPs’ new leadership under John Swinney (above) has given assurances that there will be no rolling back of rights amid concerns following the appointment of Kate Forbes as Deputy First Minister.
Previously, Forbes’s socially conservative views, including saying she would have voted against gay marriage, have sparked controversy.
Elsewhere at the Edinburgh event, Sturgeon said the Scottish Parliament’s committee system should be “beefed up” considerably, to give ministers more challenging scrutiny.
The former first minister said she was not suitably “terrified” when she was called to appear before Holyrood committee conveners when she was in government.
She said: “I’m not sure it’s an experience that was as terrifying as it should have been for a minister or a first minister.
“And therefore I do agree with you, I think the committee system, which is right in theory, needs beefing up considerably.”
READ MORE: Glasgow Labour politician reported to ethics watchdog after son awarded contracts
She suggested Holyrood should follow the example of Westminster, where committee chairmen are elected by the whole parliament.
This would break “party political divisions” on committees, she said.
Sturgeon went on to say there is now “much greater polarisation, toxicity” in Scottish politics.
She also said Holyrood could benefit from more “spontaneity” in debates, saying speeches are often scripted and short.
Wallace said he doubted that committees would hold ministers’ “feet to the fire” in the same way as they did in earlier parliamentary sessions.
He recently called for “significantly more” MSPs to sit in the parliamentary chamber at Holyrood, saying that since the Parliament has more powers, the current number of 129 MSPs should be reviewed.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel